Skip to content

Design · 18 June 2026 · 7 min read

Why some internal software gets adopted — and most gets tolerated

The difference between software your team uses and software they route around isn't features. It's whether anyone designed for the Tuesday-afternoon reality of their work.

This is a placeholder article. In the finished site, each insight is a fully-written long-form piece — researched, edited and typeset with the same care as everything else we make.

The shape of the argument

Good writing about software avoids two traps: vendor cheerleading and abstract theory. The articles we publish come from real projects — the decisions that worked, the assumptions that didn't, and what we'd do differently. Names and details are changed; lessons are kept intact.

Each piece is written for the people who commission software as much as the people who build it. If a paragraph needs a computer science degree to parse, it gets rewritten.

What to expect

  • Practical frameworks you can apply to your own projects
  • Honest costs and trade-offs, with real (anonymised) numbers
  • No jargon where plain language will do

If you'd like to talk about how this topic applies to your business, start a conversation — we reply within a working day.

Let's build something exceptional.

Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve. We'll tell you honestly whether — and how — software can solve it.